Soon Borbollón
Hi all, soon I'll post again, I left the much-neglected blog, the reason is that I've had several little problems, including breaking my computer ...
Well we'll be seeing very soon ...
Monday, September 15, 2008
Tuesday, September 2, 2008
Josh Hutcherson Blue Boxer B
on celibacy in the Catholic Church
Well folks, here I bring a quote from the controversy of the day August 31, 2008 the newspaper Los Andes de Mendoza, who spoke on celibacy in the Catholic Church.
Well, I put it after an ideological and religious discussion I had with two friends yesterday evangelicals. I put it, after he told a lot of priests, and even came to the label as "sick" by being celibate.
Well, here there is a text that sums up my opinion ....
"is identified by the celibacy of Jesus"
A thousand times does the issue of celibacy. Most of the time is considered a burden (especially for those who do not live). It really bothers me to speak from the patients (pedophilia is a disease) or fragile (Incontinence is a weakness) and from there to generalize and put us all in the same bag. It bothers me more than the believers say on the subject human mind apart from the Christian mentality that should be at the baptism.
If we talk about the value of celibacy in today's society, we discuss what is the role of celibacy in the plan of God. Let's weigh the practical issues that have given value in history. And ask those who practice what they have to say about it. Once in Chile, speaking to a group of friends about the desirability or otherwise of celibacy in the Church today. We were eight. Seven were against and one in favor. There were seven lay people and me: the only I was in favor of celibacy was this set ...
Jesus teaches that "some do not marry because they are born helpless breast of his mother, others because they were castrated men, and there are others who decided not to marry because of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can hear, understand ! (Matt. 19:12). In the words of Jesus we get two things: celibacy is a man's free choice and is chosen as an offering to God.
uality Celibacy is a healthy and integrated personality armoniasa. The bachelor is someone who stops the genital side without giving up their male suality. Abstebiéndose using natural reproductive capacity, comes with love to build the Kingdom of God planted the Word of God among men and women of his village.
I dropped everything to start my priestly formation at 23 years of age. He studied Social Communication (year 1987) and also worked in a business office. What I took was to abandon not be a future family. What cost me deeply was the surrender of militanicia party, ie, serving society through participation in a political party. I say this to note that, at some point, we must all make choices in life. The important thing is that these options take from the freedom and the horizon of the search for the greater glory of God and service to mankind.
Father Fabian Castro.
Well folks, here I bring a quote from the controversy of the day August 31, 2008 the newspaper Los Andes de Mendoza, who spoke on celibacy in the Catholic Church.
Well, I put it after an ideological and religious discussion I had with two friends yesterday evangelicals. I put it, after he told a lot of priests, and even came to the label as "sick" by being celibate.
Well, here there is a text that sums up my opinion ....
"is identified by the celibacy of Jesus"
A thousand times does the issue of celibacy. Most of the time is considered a burden (especially for those who do not live). It really bothers me to speak from the patients (pedophilia is a disease) or fragile (Incontinence is a weakness) and from there to generalize and put us all in the same bag. It bothers me more than the believers say on the subject human mind apart from the Christian mentality that should be at the baptism.
If we talk about the value of celibacy in today's society, we discuss what is the role of celibacy in the plan of God. Let's weigh the practical issues that have given value in history. And ask those who practice what they have to say about it. Once in Chile, speaking to a group of friends about the desirability or otherwise of celibacy in the Church today. We were eight. Seven were against and one in favor. There were seven lay people and me: the only I was in favor of celibacy was this set ...
Jesus teaches that "some do not marry because they are born helpless breast of his mother, others because they were castrated men, and there are others who decided not to marry because of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can hear, understand ! (Matt. 19:12). In the words of Jesus we get two things: celibacy is a man's free choice and is chosen as an offering to God.
uality Celibacy is a healthy and integrated personality armoniasa. The bachelor is someone who stops the genital side without giving up their male suality. Abstebiéndose using natural reproductive capacity, comes with love to build the Kingdom of God planted the Word of God among men and women of his village.
I dropped everything to start my priestly formation at 23 years of age. He studied Social Communication (year 1987) and also worked in a business office. What I took was to abandon not be a future family. What cost me deeply was the surrender of militanicia party, ie, serving society through participation in a political party. I say this to note that, at some point, we must all make choices in life. The important thing is that these options take from the freedom and the horizon of the search for the greater glory of God and service to mankind.
Father Fabian Castro.
Friday, August 22, 2008
Bake A Cake In Corning Ware
surrogacy
Hello everyone, this post is about a very controversial topic, with many pros and cons ....
write about this issue because last night talking to my sister, and did the theme of a famous singer bought a woman's egg, then put them in the womb of another, which also paid with their sperm and so have two sons ....
I wonder, is that the child has no identity?? Since you no longer have a mother, or a part of their identity is lost, and what I've heard forever.
I wonder if the anxious father could not wait for the right person to conceive their children, I sincerely sounds very selfish, he put in front of their children going to do tomorrow when they will ask for his mother, who will say, look at little ones have no mother, well yes they might have two or three, one that put the other part of the seed to be born, one that took them inside her, and was the one who fed and cared for nine months, and one that I am, because I grew up and turned the paper Papi and Mami ??????? Honestly the fact
rent wombs, most still do what he did this renowned artist, I think against the ethics and morals, I know many archaic branded me, (my sister told me to be against surrogacy), but I think in this case is played with fine lines of morality and ethics ....
Many think that buying eggs and sperm from an unknown use are the same, and yes, I think that if, besides that if you want to have a child is always the option to adopt and help a person to be happy I do not think that influence biological child is love and the affection that can be given that human ...
Hello everyone, this post is about a very controversial topic, with many pros and cons ....
write about this issue because last night talking to my sister, and did the theme of a famous singer bought a woman's egg, then put them in the womb of another, which also paid with their sperm and so have two sons ....
I wonder, is that the child has no identity?? Since you no longer have a mother, or a part of their identity is lost, and what I've heard forever.
I wonder if the anxious father could not wait for the right person to conceive their children, I sincerely sounds very selfish, he put in front of their children going to do tomorrow when they will ask for his mother, who will say, look at little ones have no mother, well yes they might have two or three, one that put the other part of the seed to be born, one that took them inside her, and was the one who fed and cared for nine months, and one that I am, because I grew up and turned the paper Papi and Mami ??????? Honestly the fact
rent wombs, most still do what he did this renowned artist, I think against the ethics and morals, I know many archaic branded me, (my sister told me to be against surrogacy), but I think in this case is played with fine lines of morality and ethics ....
Many think that buying eggs and sperm from an unknown use are the same, and yes, I think that if, besides that if you want to have a child is always the option to adopt and help a person to be happy I do not think that influence biological child is love and the affection that can be given that human ...
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
Kates Playground Weird Foot
3-0
I can not express the surprise I get the fact that Argentina has beaten Brazil in the semifinals Saturday, leaving out the long-awaited final, no doubt the team is led by Batista, but forecasts were not encouraging ...
Finally congratulations to the athletes who accomplished the feat, I hope it is one of many ...
I can not express the surprise I get the fact that Argentina has beaten Brazil in the semifinals Saturday, leaving out the long-awaited final, no doubt the team is led by Batista, but forecasts were not encouraging ...
Finally congratulations to the athletes who accomplished the feat, I hope it is one of many ...
Sunday, August 10, 2008
Best Poofy Dresses Baby
Congratulations to Paula Pareto judo bronze !!!!!
Well folks, the idea of \u200b\u200bthis post is to congratulate Paula Pareto, the only medalist Argentina in the category of Judo.
Congratulations again, I imagine the pleasure and happiness must be feeling, as if they did not know is the first woman in Argentina's history to win a medal in Judo at some Olympic.
Well, let's see the results of Argentine competitors, and remember that the Olympic spirit of fair play is the and winning does not matter, the important thing is to compete (in the).
Well folks, the idea of \u200b\u200bthis post is to congratulate Paula Pareto, the only medalist Argentina in the category of Judo.
Congratulations again, I imagine the pleasure and happiness must be feeling, as if they did not know is the first woman in Argentina's history to win a medal in Judo at some Olympic.
Well, let's see the results of Argentine competitors, and remember that the Olympic spirit of fair play is the and winning does not matter, the important thing is to compete (in the).
Sunday, August 3, 2008
Mosquito Looking Bumps
Where is the solidarity? Problems
Where is the solidarity?, A question that certainly we do very often, especially in this blessed country where insecurity is increasing every day and dramatically.
To illustrate, we report some of the most common events of the era of cellular telephony, the loss or theft of equipment in these times common. Eg. three weeks ago I had the misfortune to lose my phone, but it was one of the newer equipment on the market, had a camera and video recorder. There were many personal nature contained in it. The matter is dropped from my bag, and I did not realize until I got home. I called, sent messages and I searched high and low, will not recover. The plane was not of high monetary value, but had to work hard to get it ....
I find it outrageous the lack of solidarity of people, it might not be able to return something that is not theirs. I always have four or five times found cell, and always returned, in itself the problem is bigger than a cell phone, the problem is we live in an era of individualism in which most people do not think in others, and only cares about herself.
I can not believe we've come so low ....
Where is the solidarity?, A question that certainly we do very often, especially in this blessed country where insecurity is increasing every day and dramatically.
To illustrate, we report some of the most common events of the era of cellular telephony, the loss or theft of equipment in these times common. Eg. three weeks ago I had the misfortune to lose my phone, but it was one of the newer equipment on the market, had a camera and video recorder. There were many personal nature contained in it. The matter is dropped from my bag, and I did not realize until I got home. I called, sent messages and I searched high and low, will not recover. The plane was not of high monetary value, but had to work hard to get it ....
I find it outrageous the lack of solidarity of people, it might not be able to return something that is not theirs. I always have four or five times found cell, and always returned, in itself the problem is bigger than a cell phone, the problem is we live in an era of individualism in which most people do not think in others, and only cares about herself.
I can not believe we've come so low ....
Thursday, July 31, 2008
White Blisters In Mouth And Throat
ISP
I'm pretty angry Speedy Telefónica's broadband in my country. Several days ago the connection is soooo slow, although I realize it is normal that on certain days and times the connection gets heavy, but I think as a consumer broadband service in this company, I have the right to receive a quality service; everyone is entitled to receive a quality service. Neither
doubt that very soon I will send my complaints to Telefónica Argentina.
I'm pretty angry Speedy Telefónica's broadband in my country. Several days ago the connection is soooo slow, although I realize it is normal that on certain days and times the connection gets heavy, but I think as a consumer broadband service in this company, I have the right to receive a quality service; everyone is entitled to receive a quality service. Neither
doubt that very soon I will send my complaints to Telefónica Argentina.
Instruction Noma Programme Thermostat
blog Yesterday I was visiting a neighbor (cronicassalemitas) and I saw that man, had put a clip with the song Hallelujah (I'm not sure you write that) of Rufus Wainwright with subtitles, for those who could speak no English (me!!). Really, it's a wonderful song and I recommend it to everyone who can, that you take a past pr blog (the address is recommended sites), or who seek youtoube video.
Well I hope you enjoy it ...
Thursday, June 12, 2008
Sunday, February 24, 2008
How To Remove A Mole With Honey
WHAT HISTORY WILL CALL HISTORY?? Two very old data resources, such as journalism and history, have a well earned reputation for its original foundation, and give a report released last another. But the economic reasons stain any action today and ensure its continuity in an era in which technology travels the backpacks of students ... Here's how to turn an interesting way to find songs with good rating. Not exactly very new, but profitable. Therefore, in Buenos Aires and we have seen a television program about the recreation of history in which, of course, nothing of what was believed to have occurred back in time was so true ...
As you know, San Martin was very ill, Mariano Moreno was murdered, Rosas was great and terrible Sarmiento, Kennedy was killed by a conspiracy with Johnson in front and behind the entire CIA, Hitler did not commit suicide ... and it seems that he moved to South America (Argentina "?) In Finally, what we hold above: it seems that nothing was or how we live and as we were told.
This at first was called "historical revisionism" is so fast that it could call it "hysterical revisionism."
now appears that Neil Armstrong, which consolidated its overall reputation for being "nothing more and nothing less, that the first man on the moon, not only did not simulated but rather. Regardless
that the statement is true or not, the fact implies something serious. If true, is not only the greatest deception in history (with 500 million witnesses we have seen) but the best, most perfect and effective.
But to explain it, and go to parties. Dog World
In the land there was always fighting, and large and devastating wars. Two of the most rapacious were crowned in the first half of the twentieth century: the first and second "world wars", samples of stupidity, idiocy and possible manipulation of the mighty of the earth. And scientific and technological power that counted in his favor: new engines of destruction increasingly powerful humanity decimated down to the atomic bomb: a gimmick that in the hands of the warriors was the coven that allowed at least the end of a seemingly endless series of deaths and destruction.
After such stupidity, the land was finally divided into two apparently irreconcilable with that of the "free world" and the countries "behind the iron curtain." This somehow translated, meant: the capitalist world, with strong influence of liberal economy, versus the socialist world, with a massed highly coercive and planned economy.
is what is called "cold war." Ie not facing directly (except through wars like Korea or Vietnam), but the tension was a way to control unstable.
One chapter of this confrontation was what was called space warfare. At one point, the United States and the Soviet Union decided that the strategy was to "gain ground", prepare to conquer and dominate from there. Remember that initially took the glory and Britain in centuries past. Conquer the places, the land, the spaces that are useful from a warrior point of view. Gibraltar and is called the South Atlantic Islands.
And the new war front was called Space. Are met so that the science fiction novel announced more than once: the War of the Worlds. A front that is enhanced by the Americans as much as the Soviets. During the second
war, all the new discovery provides stimulus to the front lines, industrial companies stopped producing cars, motorcycles and tractors to increase the power devoted to military aircraft or warrior with battle tanks. This front
overheated in the early fifties. They had turned to making cars but a new and growing state central enigmatic: the National Air and Space Administration (NASA). To which, besides the space research interest, master and appropriate, and it maddened him to do it first before anyone else which occurred to him as well.
So you can imagine what happened on October 4, 1957, when Soviet Union, a country archenemy of the United States, placed into orbit Sputnik 1, first satellite in history.
As if this were not enough, just a month later, the Soviets than his own record by placing another satellite, manned by a dog.
Can you imagine how it could counteract the great northern nation as punch to his narcissism? For placing your own satellite as I could. And it was not until January 58.
The space race was now a fact. The proof is that in September 59 the two Lunik reaches the moon, and 3 out the first picture of the dark side. It took six years of fierce competition, where in 1961 the Russians manage to put the first man in space: a journey of a couple of hours played by a son of farmers: Yuri Gagarin. And in 1962 a flight landed (no one) on behalf of Use and still another Russian in 65.
The day I stepped on the moon
What was really at stake was the ability of capitalism to survive the supposed death decreed by Marxism-Leninism and socialism's ability to grow and progress as it was billed as paradise future. On earth did the fight in wars outside their territories, Korea or Vietnam, but now he was raised a competition that would determine the most powerful, and would give in space, an area known but fascinating.
After those experiences with satellites and flying to the moon as a "big step in history", now should be given the highest: the man on the moon.
Both powers had their own perspectives. But the fact is that today, forty years later, we know that the Russians were never able to surpass the U.S. missions, the U.S. spent too much money and have killed many in a career that offers both benefits and discoveries as imagined
The truth is that, after countless ups and downs a lunar voyage was defined with three crew members. Something that his contemporaries seemed the fulfillment of the promise that was "entering the future." What is particularly surprising was the news that connected almost naturally: men who "land" would go to telecast live from the moon all that live.
To put ourselves in that time, we must ask what was the reality of television transmission, then? Satellites had for over ten years, which had improved communications. Keep in mind that before satellites, transmissions were very problematic: submarine cables to connect the continents, radio waves very volatile and short breath relay, coaxial cables. The existence of satellites had provided emissions through large antennas relay in large plants (in Argentina, in 1969 had just opened the Balcarce, which was a big step in the field of reception and transmission of sound and image long distance. I was in the hands of state administration.
Television in Argentina was going through his mid-teens, he was 17, although it was only nine years to introduce private channels to compete, and had already incorporated the videotape, resource permitting record programs in advance without having to make all "live." Worldwide color television existed, but Argentina was a long stop "amortize" the existing equipment, so all TV was black and teams change was a slow process. Not to mention the televisions, lamps huge catafalque to overheated and had to break two of three recipients.
That is, the proposal to televise from the moon was not impossible. Retransmit the world either. For all those who lived transcendent that day, there was no doubt, were down to the first man on the moon, and more supported in the story of the speakers loud spirited of the day that the certainties of what they believed to be seeing. But what was seen and what has been well documented for history. And to the point, now use this document to deny that fact. Operation Luna
Rumors about the legitimacy or otherwise of that transmission came at the same time. It is assumed that there was a fictional scenario prepared for the occasion, but the shock of that day that the rumors had prevented greater credulity. But, over time, revisionists returned to the charge and in 2001 was the Fox channel (a channel of anti-Americanism not only unexpected, but rather the opposite: a means ultra-conservative) who Propal production of powerful research raises questions: that transmission was a big lie.
Since
five hundred years it was believed that Columbus had discovered America, it seems that forty years to believe falsely that the man was walking on the moon are few. The scenarios are increasing, but we will summarize them in four possibilities: One
July 21, 1969 by astronauts on the moon did not fall, but since all eyes were on the issue, the U.S. had to make a scene Hollywood do not look ridiculous (which is what makes one suspect the Fox documentary). Yes
down on the moon, but reproduced here in a scene that was televised to the world (rumor started running from the moment of landing.)
went down, televised and what we saw (what we always believed)
There was a mix of scenes coming readable little live footage enhanced by made on stage.
Are we so stupid?
38 years ago, those events: ie all those who pass the barrier of fifty have witnessed the events reported here. It is important to ask what they remember. It will surprise the wealth of memories, indelible fact that shocked everyone in the world.
The space race was blatant, it included not only facts showing the minute who was superior in what, but he had intelligence and counterintelligence tasks, intrigue, rumors and fighting. The Americans were responsible for spreading the world that the Soviets recently reported on a mission to the end of it because they would not accept failure. Claimed that Gagarin was not the first in space, as Sergei Yliushin (son of the aircraft designer) had done a while back before but that had crashed and suffered injuries and shock. That is, if the Americans did something so rude as trout, landing on the moon, would it not have been revealed by the Soviets?
advocates the position that ensures actual decline, given as the amount of material evidence of the moon that brought and continues today exhibéndose worldwide, the hundreds of photos, films and testimonies of all that flooded the media in the 36 years following the first lunar landing.
that first may not be as legitimate as live. But if it really was a fiction that no army of five hundred million viewers noticed, we have the right to think what was legitimate in all we had to witness since the invention of electronic media. Today the "hoaxes" those pathetic emails that invite us to do something for someone who suffers daily invade us trying to interfere in falsehood at the expense of our money or email address.
We are a generation marked by what we see: bloodless war, terrorism ruthless in direct planes crashing into towers, drama taken to the millions of cameras that travel into pockets or purses. But: Is it true what we see? Will they be real conclusions to those above from the facts show? Or that simulated landing was only the beginning of a made-up reality as he ought to be?
As you know, San Martin was very ill, Mariano Moreno was murdered, Rosas was great and terrible Sarmiento, Kennedy was killed by a conspiracy with Johnson in front and behind the entire CIA, Hitler did not commit suicide ... and it seems that he moved to South America (Argentina "?) In Finally, what we hold above: it seems that nothing was or how we live and as we were told.
This at first was called "historical revisionism" is so fast that it could call it "hysterical revisionism."
now appears that Neil Armstrong, which consolidated its overall reputation for being "nothing more and nothing less, that the first man on the moon, not only did not simulated but rather. Regardless
that the statement is true or not, the fact implies something serious. If true, is not only the greatest deception in history (with 500 million witnesses we have seen) but the best, most perfect and effective.
But to explain it, and go to parties. Dog World
In the land there was always fighting, and large and devastating wars. Two of the most rapacious were crowned in the first half of the twentieth century: the first and second "world wars", samples of stupidity, idiocy and possible manipulation of the mighty of the earth. And scientific and technological power that counted in his favor: new engines of destruction increasingly powerful humanity decimated down to the atomic bomb: a gimmick that in the hands of the warriors was the coven that allowed at least the end of a seemingly endless series of deaths and destruction.
After such stupidity, the land was finally divided into two apparently irreconcilable with that of the "free world" and the countries "behind the iron curtain." This somehow translated, meant: the capitalist world, with strong influence of liberal economy, versus the socialist world, with a massed highly coercive and planned economy.
is what is called "cold war." Ie not facing directly (except through wars like Korea or Vietnam), but the tension was a way to control unstable.
One chapter of this confrontation was what was called space warfare. At one point, the United States and the Soviet Union decided that the strategy was to "gain ground", prepare to conquer and dominate from there. Remember that initially took the glory and Britain in centuries past. Conquer the places, the land, the spaces that are useful from a warrior point of view. Gibraltar and is called the South Atlantic Islands.
And the new war front was called Space. Are met so that the science fiction novel announced more than once: the War of the Worlds. A front that is enhanced by the Americans as much as the Soviets. During the second
war, all the new discovery provides stimulus to the front lines, industrial companies stopped producing cars, motorcycles and tractors to increase the power devoted to military aircraft or warrior with battle tanks. This front
overheated in the early fifties. They had turned to making cars but a new and growing state central enigmatic: the National Air and Space Administration (NASA). To which, besides the space research interest, master and appropriate, and it maddened him to do it first before anyone else which occurred to him as well.
So you can imagine what happened on October 4, 1957, when Soviet Union, a country archenemy of the United States, placed into orbit Sputnik 1, first satellite in history.
As if this were not enough, just a month later, the Soviets than his own record by placing another satellite, manned by a dog.
Can you imagine how it could counteract the great northern nation as punch to his narcissism? For placing your own satellite as I could. And it was not until January 58.
The space race was now a fact. The proof is that in September 59 the two Lunik reaches the moon, and 3 out the first picture of the dark side. It took six years of fierce competition, where in 1961 the Russians manage to put the first man in space: a journey of a couple of hours played by a son of farmers: Yuri Gagarin. And in 1962 a flight landed (no one) on behalf of Use and still another Russian in 65.
The day I stepped on the moon
What was really at stake was the ability of capitalism to survive the supposed death decreed by Marxism-Leninism and socialism's ability to grow and progress as it was billed as paradise future. On earth did the fight in wars outside their territories, Korea or Vietnam, but now he was raised a competition that would determine the most powerful, and would give in space, an area known but fascinating.
After those experiences with satellites and flying to the moon as a "big step in history", now should be given the highest: the man on the moon.
Both powers had their own perspectives. But the fact is that today, forty years later, we know that the Russians were never able to surpass the U.S. missions, the U.S. spent too much money and have killed many in a career that offers both benefits and discoveries as imagined
The truth is that, after countless ups and downs a lunar voyage was defined with three crew members. Something that his contemporaries seemed the fulfillment of the promise that was "entering the future." What is particularly surprising was the news that connected almost naturally: men who "land" would go to telecast live from the moon all that live.
To put ourselves in that time, we must ask what was the reality of television transmission, then? Satellites had for over ten years, which had improved communications. Keep in mind that before satellites, transmissions were very problematic: submarine cables to connect the continents, radio waves very volatile and short breath relay, coaxial cables. The existence of satellites had provided emissions through large antennas relay in large plants (in Argentina, in 1969 had just opened the Balcarce, which was a big step in the field of reception and transmission of sound and image long distance. I was in the hands of state administration.
Television in Argentina was going through his mid-teens, he was 17, although it was only nine years to introduce private channels to compete, and had already incorporated the videotape, resource permitting record programs in advance without having to make all "live." Worldwide color television existed, but Argentina was a long stop "amortize" the existing equipment, so all TV was black and teams change was a slow process. Not to mention the televisions, lamps huge catafalque to overheated and had to break two of three recipients.
That is, the proposal to televise from the moon was not impossible. Retransmit the world either. For all those who lived transcendent that day, there was no doubt, were down to the first man on the moon, and more supported in the story of the speakers loud spirited of the day that the certainties of what they believed to be seeing. But what was seen and what has been well documented for history. And to the point, now use this document to deny that fact. Operation Luna
Rumors about the legitimacy or otherwise of that transmission came at the same time. It is assumed that there was a fictional scenario prepared for the occasion, but the shock of that day that the rumors had prevented greater credulity. But, over time, revisionists returned to the charge and in 2001 was the Fox channel (a channel of anti-Americanism not only unexpected, but rather the opposite: a means ultra-conservative) who Propal production of powerful research raises questions: that transmission was a big lie.
Since
five hundred years it was believed that Columbus had discovered America, it seems that forty years to believe falsely that the man was walking on the moon are few. The scenarios are increasing, but we will summarize them in four possibilities: One
July 21, 1969 by astronauts on the moon did not fall, but since all eyes were on the issue, the U.S. had to make a scene Hollywood do not look ridiculous (which is what makes one suspect the Fox documentary). Yes
down on the moon, but reproduced here in a scene that was televised to the world (rumor started running from the moment of landing.)
went down, televised and what we saw (what we always believed)
There was a mix of scenes coming readable little live footage enhanced by made on stage.
Are we so stupid?
38 years ago, those events: ie all those who pass the barrier of fifty have witnessed the events reported here. It is important to ask what they remember. It will surprise the wealth of memories, indelible fact that shocked everyone in the world.
The space race was blatant, it included not only facts showing the minute who was superior in what, but he had intelligence and counterintelligence tasks, intrigue, rumors and fighting. The Americans were responsible for spreading the world that the Soviets recently reported on a mission to the end of it because they would not accept failure. Claimed that Gagarin was not the first in space, as Sergei Yliushin (son of the aircraft designer) had done a while back before but that had crashed and suffered injuries and shock. That is, if the Americans did something so rude as trout, landing on the moon, would it not have been revealed by the Soviets?
advocates the position that ensures actual decline, given as the amount of material evidence of the moon that brought and continues today exhibéndose worldwide, the hundreds of photos, films and testimonies of all that flooded the media in the 36 years following the first lunar landing.
that first may not be as legitimate as live. But if it really was a fiction that no army of five hundred million viewers noticed, we have the right to think what was legitimate in all we had to witness since the invention of electronic media. Today the "hoaxes" those pathetic emails that invite us to do something for someone who suffers daily invade us trying to interfere in falsehood at the expense of our money or email address.
We are a generation marked by what we see: bloodless war, terrorism ruthless in direct planes crashing into towers, drama taken to the millions of cameras that travel into pockets or purses. But: Is it true what we see? Will they be real conclusions to those above from the facts show? Or that simulated landing was only the beginning of a made-up reality as he ought to be?
Monday, January 21, 2008
Low Iron But Normal Hemoglobin
NOTHING MORE THAN AN OLD DIARY OF JANUARY
journalists go on vacation in January and editors are left to "automatic pilots" about news predictable and multimedia promotions.
always seemed very amused by the situation created during the holidays with the newspapers. As we know, the people who most often given to the press material "disappears" and change its natural beaches, mountains and lakes of the south (politicians and professionals in general, led by lawyers and judges, psychologists and teachers, and much business spectrum.)
Unless shown a shocking accident or crime, usually spend a little to give good color to the newspapers every day. Then the editorial crazy to find "something" to justify its retention market with a decent amount of pages printed.
In some of the issues this weekend, the daily "Profile" appeared a story that can lead the list of examples of what you say, in this supposed scoop: Shakira's funeral notice appeared in the newspaper "La Nación" the death of a relative of her partner. But this news show at another time would never be published in a parish bulletin, do not go to the saga the rest of their colleagues, giving unused space to insignificance, or gossip just confirmed on which runs as unlikely. And that often top issues as always full of news about multimedia marketing, competitions and promotions in newspapers, magazines and DVDs that no one should miss. What always happens
reported especially in the second half of January, in which any flight fly can be identified as "news" as the transcendental event in Monday's edition of Clarin in reporting that the last year traffic grew by 18.3%. Or the example of the main front-page headline of Sunday 20 Clarín: "They will open 20 new shopping malls by the consumer boom." In either of the two days you may also find the usual news about the marketing of multimedia, their contests and promotion of newspapers, magazines and DVDs that no one should miss.
To close the example, use "The Nation" on Monday 21, wherein news looming as the 40% rise in rents in Mar del Plata and 45% overall in the prices of the holiday. Not to mention a series of advances of multimedia, its competitions and promotions in newspapers, magazines and DVDs that no one should miss.
But let's not forget the repertoire of platitudes that usually appeal to each version, themselves beaten by the excessive number of journalists on vacation. January in any newspaper worth its salt, one can find a precise detail the number of robberies on the coast, with review how were the facts and statements of those affected. Also a story of tourists stranded at airports, bus stations and train stations, collected hours of delay or the consequences of cancellation of services. And even statistics inevitable growth of tourism with hotel capacity accounts exceeded. And, of course, each edition is packed with news about the marketing of multimedia, its competitions and promotions in newspapers, magazines and DVDs that no one should miss.
In short: you Title: All of these day old smack in the middle of January. And this without delving into television, where it is possible to get to know the idiosyncrasies and thought a number of starlets who no one even knew about its existence!
Well, after all so no complaints: we should not have gone on holiday as well?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)