WHAT HISTORY WILL CALL HISTORY?? Two very old data resources, such as journalism and history, have a well earned reputation for its original foundation, and give a report released last another. But the economic reasons stain any action today and ensure its continuity in an era in which technology travels the backpacks of students ... Here's how to turn an interesting way to find songs with good rating. Not exactly very new, but profitable. Therefore, in Buenos Aires and we have seen a television program about the recreation of history in which, of course, nothing of what was believed to have occurred back in time was so true ...
As you know, San Martin was very ill, Mariano Moreno was murdered, Rosas was great and terrible Sarmiento, Kennedy was killed by a conspiracy with Johnson in front and behind the entire CIA, Hitler did not commit suicide ... and it seems that he moved to South America (Argentina "?) In Finally, what we hold above: it seems that nothing was or how we live and as we were told.
This at first was called "historical revisionism" is so fast that it could call it "hysterical revisionism."
now appears that Neil Armstrong, which consolidated its overall reputation for being "nothing more and nothing less, that the first man on the moon, not only did not simulated but rather. Regardless
that the statement is true or not, the fact implies something serious. If true, is not only the greatest deception in history (with 500 million witnesses we have seen) but the best, most perfect and effective.
But to explain it, and go to parties. Dog World
In the land there was always fighting, and large and devastating wars. Two of the most rapacious were crowned in the first half of the twentieth century: the first and second "world wars", samples of stupidity, idiocy and possible manipulation of the mighty of the earth. And scientific and technological power that counted in his favor: new engines of destruction increasingly powerful humanity decimated down to the atomic bomb: a gimmick that in the hands of the warriors was the coven that allowed at least the end of a seemingly endless series of deaths and destruction.
After such stupidity, the land was finally divided into two apparently irreconcilable with that of the "free world" and the countries "behind the iron curtain." This somehow translated, meant: the capitalist world, with strong influence of liberal economy, versus the socialist world, with a massed highly coercive and planned economy.
is what is called "cold war." Ie not facing directly (except through wars like Korea or Vietnam), but the tension was a way to control unstable.
One chapter of this confrontation was what was called space warfare. At one point, the United States and the Soviet Union decided that the strategy was to "gain ground", prepare to conquer and dominate from there. Remember that initially took the glory and Britain in centuries past. Conquer the places, the land, the spaces that are useful from a warrior point of view. Gibraltar and is called the South Atlantic Islands.
And the new war front was called Space. Are met so that the science fiction novel announced more than once: the War of the Worlds. A front that is enhanced by the Americans as much as the Soviets. During the second
war, all the new discovery provides stimulus to the front lines, industrial companies stopped producing cars, motorcycles and tractors to increase the power devoted to military aircraft or warrior with battle tanks. This front
overheated in the early fifties. They had turned to making cars but a new and growing state central enigmatic: the National Air and Space Administration (NASA). To which, besides the space research interest, master and appropriate, and it maddened him to do it first before anyone else which occurred to him as well.
So you can imagine what happened on October 4, 1957, when Soviet Union, a country archenemy of the United States, placed into orbit Sputnik 1, first satellite in history.
As if this were not enough, just a month later, the Soviets than his own record by placing another satellite, manned by a dog.
Can you imagine how it could counteract the great northern nation as punch to his narcissism? For placing your own satellite as I could. And it was not until January 58.
The space race was now a fact. The proof is that in September 59 the two Lunik reaches the moon, and 3 out the first picture of the dark side. It took six years of fierce competition, where in 1961 the Russians manage to put the first man in space: a journey of a couple of hours played by a son of farmers: Yuri Gagarin. And in 1962 a flight landed (no one) on behalf of Use and still another Russian in 65.
The day I stepped on the moon
What was really at stake was the ability of capitalism to survive the supposed death decreed by Marxism-Leninism and socialism's ability to grow and progress as it was billed as paradise future. On earth did the fight in wars outside their territories, Korea or Vietnam, but now he was raised a competition that would determine the most powerful, and would give in space, an area known but fascinating.
After those experiences with satellites and flying to the moon as a "big step in history", now should be given the highest: the man on the moon.
Both powers had their own perspectives. But the fact is that today, forty years later, we know that the Russians were never able to surpass the U.S. missions, the U.S. spent too much money and have killed many in a career that offers both benefits and discoveries as imagined
The truth is that, after countless ups and downs a lunar voyage was defined with three crew members. Something that his contemporaries seemed the fulfillment of the promise that was "entering the future." What is particularly surprising was the news that connected almost naturally: men who "land" would go to telecast live from the moon all that live.
To put ourselves in that time, we must ask what was the reality of television transmission, then? Satellites had for over ten years, which had improved communications. Keep in mind that before satellites, transmissions were very problematic: submarine cables to connect the continents, radio waves very volatile and short breath relay, coaxial cables. The existence of satellites had provided emissions through large antennas relay in large plants (in Argentina, in 1969 had just opened the Balcarce, which was a big step in the field of reception and transmission of sound and image long distance. I was in the hands of state administration.
Television in Argentina was going through his mid-teens, he was 17, although it was only nine years to introduce private channels to compete, and had already incorporated the videotape, resource permitting record programs in advance without having to make all "live." Worldwide color television existed, but Argentina was a long stop "amortize" the existing equipment, so all TV was black and teams change was a slow process. Not to mention the televisions, lamps huge catafalque to overheated and had to break two of three recipients.
That is, the proposal to televise from the moon was not impossible. Retransmit the world either. For all those who lived transcendent that day, there was no doubt, were down to the first man on the moon, and more supported in the story of the speakers loud spirited of the day that the certainties of what they believed to be seeing. But what was seen and what has been well documented for history. And to the point, now use this document to deny that fact. Operation Luna
Rumors about the legitimacy or otherwise of that transmission came at the same time. It is assumed that there was a fictional scenario prepared for the occasion, but the shock of that day that the rumors had prevented greater credulity. But, over time, revisionists returned to the charge and in 2001 was the Fox channel (a channel of anti-Americanism not only unexpected, but rather the opposite: a means ultra-conservative) who Propal production of powerful research raises questions: that transmission was a big lie.
Since
five hundred years it was believed that Columbus had discovered America, it seems that forty years to believe falsely that the man was walking on the moon are few. The scenarios are increasing, but we will summarize them in four possibilities: One
July 21, 1969 by astronauts on the moon did not fall, but since all eyes were on the issue, the U.S. had to make a scene Hollywood do not look ridiculous (which is what makes one suspect the Fox documentary). Yes
down on the moon, but reproduced here in a scene that was televised to the world (rumor started running from the moment of landing.)
went down, televised and what we saw (what we always believed)
There was a mix of scenes coming readable little live footage enhanced by made on stage.
Are we so stupid?
38 years ago, those events: ie all those who pass the barrier of fifty have witnessed the events reported here. It is important to ask what they remember. It will surprise the wealth of memories, indelible fact that shocked everyone in the world.
The space race was blatant, it included not only facts showing the minute who was superior in what, but he had intelligence and counterintelligence tasks, intrigue, rumors and fighting. The Americans were responsible for spreading the world that the Soviets recently reported on a mission to the end of it because they would not accept failure. Claimed that Gagarin was not the first in space, as Sergei Yliushin (son of the aircraft designer) had done a while back before but that had crashed and suffered injuries and shock. That is, if the Americans did something so rude as trout, landing on the moon, would it not have been revealed by the Soviets?
advocates the position that ensures actual decline, given as the amount of material evidence of the moon that brought and continues today exhibéndose worldwide, the hundreds of photos, films and testimonies of all that flooded the media in the 36 years following the first lunar landing.
that first may not be as legitimate as live. But if it really was a fiction that no army of five hundred million viewers noticed, we have the right to think what was legitimate in all we had to witness since the invention of electronic media. Today the "hoaxes" those pathetic emails that invite us to do something for someone who suffers daily invade us trying to interfere in falsehood at the expense of our money or email address.
We are a generation marked by what we see: bloodless war, terrorism ruthless in direct planes crashing into towers, drama taken to the millions of cameras that travel into pockets or purses. But: Is it true what we see? Will they be real conclusions to those above from the facts show? Or that simulated landing was only the beginning of a made-up reality as he ought to be?
As you know, San Martin was very ill, Mariano Moreno was murdered, Rosas was great and terrible Sarmiento, Kennedy was killed by a conspiracy with Johnson in front and behind the entire CIA, Hitler did not commit suicide ... and it seems that he moved to South America (Argentina "?) In Finally, what we hold above: it seems that nothing was or how we live and as we were told.
This at first was called "historical revisionism" is so fast that it could call it "hysterical revisionism."
now appears that Neil Armstrong, which consolidated its overall reputation for being "nothing more and nothing less, that the first man on the moon, not only did not simulated but rather. Regardless
that the statement is true or not, the fact implies something serious. If true, is not only the greatest deception in history (with 500 million witnesses we have seen) but the best, most perfect and effective.
But to explain it, and go to parties. Dog World
In the land there was always fighting, and large and devastating wars. Two of the most rapacious were crowned in the first half of the twentieth century: the first and second "world wars", samples of stupidity, idiocy and possible manipulation of the mighty of the earth. And scientific and technological power that counted in his favor: new engines of destruction increasingly powerful humanity decimated down to the atomic bomb: a gimmick that in the hands of the warriors was the coven that allowed at least the end of a seemingly endless series of deaths and destruction.
After such stupidity, the land was finally divided into two apparently irreconcilable with that of the "free world" and the countries "behind the iron curtain." This somehow translated, meant: the capitalist world, with strong influence of liberal economy, versus the socialist world, with a massed highly coercive and planned economy.
is what is called "cold war." Ie not facing directly (except through wars like Korea or Vietnam), but the tension was a way to control unstable.
One chapter of this confrontation was what was called space warfare. At one point, the United States and the Soviet Union decided that the strategy was to "gain ground", prepare to conquer and dominate from there. Remember that initially took the glory and Britain in centuries past. Conquer the places, the land, the spaces that are useful from a warrior point of view. Gibraltar and is called the South Atlantic Islands.
And the new war front was called Space. Are met so that the science fiction novel announced more than once: the War of the Worlds. A front that is enhanced by the Americans as much as the Soviets. During the second
war, all the new discovery provides stimulus to the front lines, industrial companies stopped producing cars, motorcycles and tractors to increase the power devoted to military aircraft or warrior with battle tanks. This front
overheated in the early fifties. They had turned to making cars but a new and growing state central enigmatic: the National Air and Space Administration (NASA). To which, besides the space research interest, master and appropriate, and it maddened him to do it first before anyone else which occurred to him as well.
So you can imagine what happened on October 4, 1957, when Soviet Union, a country archenemy of the United States, placed into orbit Sputnik 1, first satellite in history.
As if this were not enough, just a month later, the Soviets than his own record by placing another satellite, manned by a dog.
Can you imagine how it could counteract the great northern nation as punch to his narcissism? For placing your own satellite as I could. And it was not until January 58.
The space race was now a fact. The proof is that in September 59 the two Lunik reaches the moon, and 3 out the first picture of the dark side. It took six years of fierce competition, where in 1961 the Russians manage to put the first man in space: a journey of a couple of hours played by a son of farmers: Yuri Gagarin. And in 1962 a flight landed (no one) on behalf of Use and still another Russian in 65.
The day I stepped on the moon
What was really at stake was the ability of capitalism to survive the supposed death decreed by Marxism-Leninism and socialism's ability to grow and progress as it was billed as paradise future. On earth did the fight in wars outside their territories, Korea or Vietnam, but now he was raised a competition that would determine the most powerful, and would give in space, an area known but fascinating.
After those experiences with satellites and flying to the moon as a "big step in history", now should be given the highest: the man on the moon.
Both powers had their own perspectives. But the fact is that today, forty years later, we know that the Russians were never able to surpass the U.S. missions, the U.S. spent too much money and have killed many in a career that offers both benefits and discoveries as imagined
The truth is that, after countless ups and downs a lunar voyage was defined with three crew members. Something that his contemporaries seemed the fulfillment of the promise that was "entering the future." What is particularly surprising was the news that connected almost naturally: men who "land" would go to telecast live from the moon all that live.
To put ourselves in that time, we must ask what was the reality of television transmission, then? Satellites had for over ten years, which had improved communications. Keep in mind that before satellites, transmissions were very problematic: submarine cables to connect the continents, radio waves very volatile and short breath relay, coaxial cables. The existence of satellites had provided emissions through large antennas relay in large plants (in Argentina, in 1969 had just opened the Balcarce, which was a big step in the field of reception and transmission of sound and image long distance. I was in the hands of state administration.
Television in Argentina was going through his mid-teens, he was 17, although it was only nine years to introduce private channels to compete, and had already incorporated the videotape, resource permitting record programs in advance without having to make all "live." Worldwide color television existed, but Argentina was a long stop "amortize" the existing equipment, so all TV was black and teams change was a slow process. Not to mention the televisions, lamps huge catafalque to overheated and had to break two of three recipients.
That is, the proposal to televise from the moon was not impossible. Retransmit the world either. For all those who lived transcendent that day, there was no doubt, were down to the first man on the moon, and more supported in the story of the speakers loud spirited of the day that the certainties of what they believed to be seeing. But what was seen and what has been well documented for history. And to the point, now use this document to deny that fact. Operation Luna
Rumors about the legitimacy or otherwise of that transmission came at the same time. It is assumed that there was a fictional scenario prepared for the occasion, but the shock of that day that the rumors had prevented greater credulity. But, over time, revisionists returned to the charge and in 2001 was the Fox channel (a channel of anti-Americanism not only unexpected, but rather the opposite: a means ultra-conservative) who Propal production of powerful research raises questions: that transmission was a big lie.
Since
five hundred years it was believed that Columbus had discovered America, it seems that forty years to believe falsely that the man was walking on the moon are few. The scenarios are increasing, but we will summarize them in four possibilities: One
July 21, 1969 by astronauts on the moon did not fall, but since all eyes were on the issue, the U.S. had to make a scene Hollywood do not look ridiculous (which is what makes one suspect the Fox documentary). Yes
down on the moon, but reproduced here in a scene that was televised to the world (rumor started running from the moment of landing.)
went down, televised and what we saw (what we always believed)
There was a mix of scenes coming readable little live footage enhanced by made on stage.
Are we so stupid?
38 years ago, those events: ie all those who pass the barrier of fifty have witnessed the events reported here. It is important to ask what they remember. It will surprise the wealth of memories, indelible fact that shocked everyone in the world.
The space race was blatant, it included not only facts showing the minute who was superior in what, but he had intelligence and counterintelligence tasks, intrigue, rumors and fighting. The Americans were responsible for spreading the world that the Soviets recently reported on a mission to the end of it because they would not accept failure. Claimed that Gagarin was not the first in space, as Sergei Yliushin (son of the aircraft designer) had done a while back before but that had crashed and suffered injuries and shock. That is, if the Americans did something so rude as trout, landing on the moon, would it not have been revealed by the Soviets?
advocates the position that ensures actual decline, given as the amount of material evidence of the moon that brought and continues today exhibéndose worldwide, the hundreds of photos, films and testimonies of all that flooded the media in the 36 years following the first lunar landing.
that first may not be as legitimate as live. But if it really was a fiction that no army of five hundred million viewers noticed, we have the right to think what was legitimate in all we had to witness since the invention of electronic media. Today the "hoaxes" those pathetic emails that invite us to do something for someone who suffers daily invade us trying to interfere in falsehood at the expense of our money or email address.
We are a generation marked by what we see: bloodless war, terrorism ruthless in direct planes crashing into towers, drama taken to the millions of cameras that travel into pockets or purses. But: Is it true what we see? Will they be real conclusions to those above from the facts show? Or that simulated landing was only the beginning of a made-up reality as he ought to be?
