Tremolar with pride and bravery.
Why to reach out to kids usually choose an unintelligible language?
For a kid who came to enjoy the street from the ball, the hidden, hopscotch and kick a ball, enter the world of the school involved too many changes. All very strange.
I'm talking about my first contact with the "civilized world" that presupposed the "education." A mission of my teachers from my income would take me all the vices of popular speech, and start asking me a lot of fine living forms "educated."
To make myself understood, force her to my reader to get into the skin of someone who in the fifties began primary school: one was full of ghosts, myths and prejudices corroded by the number of issues "which can not talk."
That's where I first met a world not directly understandable. To understand what I mean I give the example of the songs "My flag" and "Aurora", both mandatory learning letters around student learning plan.
"Here is the flag that day in the battle tremolo triumphant and full of pride and bravery at San Lorenzo went immortal" ineffable says the first, "So in high aurora irradial, arrowhead mimics the golden face and neck as the cardinal wake," spits the second, which was sung every day.
After six years, one is a species of parrot that repeats everything, especially if you have to sing. But does anyone know what language inspired poets invented these words? Except
compulsory singing these songs did any reader can ensure you have used the verb basis ever waving? Does anyone imagine what can become immortal go anywhere with pride and bravery? What thing would become a high irradial aurora? "And imitate a golden face? What is a cardinal neck? And no cheating by looking at the dictionary, referring to Google or Wikipedia!
This happened to me in the 50's, but these songs remain the same. No one would think "update" the letters, as it did Catholicism with the Our Father, which is not the same as it was recited when I was a child.
But these songs are just a sample. Songs, poems and many tales and stories usual unrecognizable mainstream education in the use of words, metaphors and turns of unusual use. Can be reached argued that forcing their use is a way of enriching educational poor knowledge of the boys?
But example, I was never served the effort they put my teachers because I say "sidewalk" rather than sidewalk. Despite the insistence, not joined or my everyday speech or the writing. Is that the word elegant path seems, is what everyone says, and sure-except-class is the teachers themselves used in their daily lives. Why
effort to use terminology rare?
defect seems to be a tendency of "serious literature", the poetics and in general the gleanings that, fortunately, never attacked the daily speech. Not even the most culturalized people.